The slides for todays presentation at ESE-2012 in Sindelfingen can be found here.
It’s summer again! This is not only the time where we can enjoy the sun shining, it is as well Demo Camp time This year itemis is holding a Demo Camp in Suttgart. If you are interested in joining, please register yourself on the Wiki page. I think the program looks quite promising. We have sessions covering topics from building enterprise applications on top of OSGi down to building embedded applications. And obviously there will be a get-together in end.
I am looking forward to meet you in Stuttgart!
While the submission deadline is now really close (you have one more day to submit your talks!!!), the program committee is warming up for reviewing all of your submissions. This year we would like to ask for your help as well. The new comment system has a voting and commenting functionality for all of you. You can find it at the very bottom of each submission (The links are called “Vote for this session” and “Add new comment”) It would be great if you could go through the submissions and let us know what you think, what you want to see in the program and where you see potential for improvement. The more comments we get the easier it is for us to come up with a program of your choice.
I am looking very much forward to your comments – and of course your submission, too
…and so is the deadline for EclipseCon Europe. Before you get into your car, jump on the train, or take off on the plane to enjoy your well-deserved holiday, please make sure to send in your contribution for this year’s ECE.
I am really looking forward to November. We have more space and can welcome more attendees. Also, we are celebrating a special milestone on the first day of the conference: Eclipse’s 10th birthday.
So make sure to submit your talks and block your calendar for November 2 – 4. The early-bird submission deadline is August 3, and the deadline for all submissions is August 17.
We look forward to reading your proposals!
Last Thursday was my last day in Walldorf. After nearly 3 years working at SAP it was time for me to move on. During this time I had the pleasure to meat many great people and to work on exciting technologies in the area of Modeling in the beginning to the domain of Cloud Computing in the end.
On Friday I then had my first day at itemis where I will work as a team lead, architect and consultant. I am very much looking forward to my new role. Let’s see what the future brings
I will continue to lead the Program Committee for EclipseCon Europe in fall this year. Together with my colleagues I am looking forward to your submissions
Now, that’s it. The program for the upcoming Eclipse Summit Europe 2010 is final. In a few days, maybe even only hours you will be able to see the conference schedule. More than 240 e-mails have been sent after Anne pushed the “Big Button” this afternoon letting people know if their submissions where accepted or not. 242 submissions is a new all time record for ESE after 206 proposals from last year. I think this is great! And I want to thank everybody who submitted something, especially those people whose talks were now rejected. I know that many people are now unhappy about their talk being not in the program. In fact, I already got some messages indicating that only minutes after the mails where send out. Obviously, people are curious to know why their session has been rejected and asked for more transparency. So I will try to explain a bit what has been going on and how we (this is Boris Bokowski, Christine Mitterbauer, Doug Clarke, Ed Merks Peter Siwon and myself) came up with the program which is now online.
In most of the cases the talks were not rejected because of their quality but because of the lack of rooms and time. ESE is a three-day low-cost conference. In the location we have 5 rooms which can hold 40 to 730 people. The first day is reserved for tutorials and symposia. Each tutorial and symposia is scheduled to be 4 hours. This year we can offer interesting 5 tutorials in the morning and 4 great symposia in the afternoon. Tuesday and Wednesday are then classical sessions where one room is reserved for sponsored talks. Sponsored talks are as well technical sessions, sometimes with, sometimes without advertisement. They are necessary to keep the fees low.
On Wednesday we start at 9:00 in the morning; the last session closes at 6:30 followed by a poster reception and BoFs which you can propose on site. On Thursday we again start at 9:00 and close at 16:00 as many attendees need to catch their trains or plains to get back home again. This gives us a bit more than 11 hour of technical content for those two days all together (given that we need some breaks and food in between as well J). In order to keep the conference fees minimal we can only give away a very limited amount of free passes. We as the program committee decided that we want to have as many sessions possible, but still allow the speakers to have enough time to deliver insightful presentations. This is why we decided to have 8 long talks (50 min each) 52 short talks (lasting 25 min) and no lightning talks. This decision had to be made even before the submission system was opened. Now you know the cornerstones on which our decisions are based on.
As in recent years we had 5 categories – E4, Embedded, Modeling, Runtime and Other / New & Noteworthy. Although we had a fairly large spreading on the number of submission per category (Other/NN had the most, followed by Modeling) we wanted to have roughly the same amount of talks per category. Later, as the program continued to shape this changed a bit, but in general I think this idea is still very much reflected in the program. In total we had to decide for 60 talks out 240 submissions which means that we could only accept 1 out of 4! The criteria to accept a talk was to attract as many people as possible. This means that we tried to figure out what is currently of high interest in the community, which projects have been very active during the last year and thus can tell a story, which speakers are known to deliver great presentations, where are new projects with high potential which are currently only known to few people, … But in addition to that we wanted to have some real user stories in. We think that this as well adds high value if people know not only *how* things can be done but also get some inspirations on *what* can be done with Eclipse technologies. And maybe even the committers (so the people typically giving the presentations) can have some take-away from that and know where they or their projects can improve. I am grateful for having Boris, Christine, Doug, and Ed with me on the PC this year. Everybody of them is deeply involved in the Eclipse community and has deep insights into the projects and the very diverse Eclipse ecosystem. Together we managed in about 20 conference calls and many, many hours of work to read carefully through all submissions, to bring them into an order, to discuss them where we had different opinions, to ask for clarification where necessary and finally, to decide on what we think will be the best program for this year. Being a member of the program committee is for sure an honor but it is as well a lot of work, so once again, kudos to all PC members and thank you for the time you invested. At this point I’d also like to thank Anne for helping us with the various organizational issues we had to discuss and deal with.
I hope you got some insights on how we worked, how we made our decisions and maybe as well why we took them that way. With the many great submissions I think we could have easily filled another 2 days. If your talk was rejected this time don’t give up and give it a try next time again. Or maybe you want to do a poster presentation? The submission system for that is still open. Your next chance for a talk is EclipseCon 2011. The more proposals a conference gets, the harder the job of the program committee is but as well, the better the program will end up.
By the way, have you noticed that we will have 3 exiting keynotes this year? I am really looking forward to every single one of them. And not only to them Hope to see you all at ESE again to have some fun!
Today I gave a talk on the next generation EMF Model Query together with my colleague Christian Mohr. It was well attended and we got some really good feedback.
The EMF Model Query deals with finding EMF model elements. The current version has some limitations, especially with respect to scalability. The basic problem is that you have to pass in the EObjects you’d like to find in your result. This means that you have load all these elements. For large models this is not feasible. Another issue is the missing type safety for your queries. All these things among many others should go away with the new implementation.
The code for the new query is already in the CVS and build will start to show up soon (they are already available on Hudson). Here is a screen-shot to give you an impression of how the syntax looks like.
In one of my next posts I’ll give some more insights, so stay tuned
Since the early beginnings, every Eclipse Summit had a Modeling Symposium. The symposia are meant to be forums for discussion and exchange between committers of the various projects and the community. Following the tradition, also this year’s Eclipse Summit has a Modeling Symposium. It will be organized by Ed Merks and myself. We are currently looking for proposals. A proposal might be a demo you’d like to show or something you really like or dislike about the Eclipse Modeling Project and you want to discuss it with the other attendees. Or maybe you have an idea for a new project and you’d like to gather feedback? This is also something you might want to submit. You see, the symposium is all about you, the committer, the contributor, the user. Please send your proposal (about one page) via e-mail to Ed and myself. The proposal should contain some information on what you’d like to demo or discuss and why you think it is relevant.
We are looking forward to your proposals.
This is the final reminder for all who would like to give a presentation at the upcoming Eclipse Summit Europe. Currently we have already over 110 proposals
The submission system will close tomorrow – so don’t miss your chance
After Boris Gruschko and I together with Martin Strenge and Christian Mohr received our committer rights for EMF Query, Validation and Transactions, our first task has been to move the current build from the old modeling build infrastructure to the new Athena common build infrastructure.
Everything worked out pretty well. The new Athena stuff is by far easier to configure than the old pde build. At this point I’d also like to thank Nick for his help. Now we have green builds again for EMF QTV